12/30/2023 0 Comments Cubase 10.5 expression maps![]() ![]() No two plugins (or even patches from within the same library) have the same number of articulations. So if your track is playing back these meta events for dynamics and, through a little environment programming, feeding the meta-event-to-note (keyswitch) data into that same plug, you can use dynamic markings to switch articulations. For example, the meta event for "fff" can be converted into a note (think "keyswitch") which lets you switch articulations in a plugin to a fff attack. The job of the transformer is to take a MIDI event of one type or another (including meta events) and convert it to some other type of event. But meta events are specific to Logic.Ģ) Logic has special environment-based MIDI manipulation "devices" (known in Environment-speak as "objects"). For perspective, each MIDI note is an event, modwheel movements are events, etc. Then you can decide for yourself if you want to go down this road.ġ) when you enter dynamic markings into Logic's score editor (like fff, mp, ppp, or even accents, staccati, etc.), Logic displays them in the event list as a special type of event called a "meta event". So that you can see what I mean, I'll give you some background as well as how it would work, as well as some pitfalls. That's not to say you couldn't handle this new bit of knowledge, but it's not beginner's stuff. Honestly, from what I've read from your other posts, I think you'd be much better off foregoing this approach for now and simply use standard keyswitching. This is totally do-able in Logic, but it's going to require an understanding of Logic's Environment. ![]() For what it's worth I am having a lot of fun learning all of this stuff! Hopefully my lack of knowledge isn't confusing the hell out of people lol. "fff" should get me a thunderous sample with harsh attack. If I want a portamento, I put that in the score or project and viola, it changes to my portamento sample. Ultimately what I would love to see incase this whole explanation is confusing (since I am new to this whole orchestral midi sequencing) is that I want to put in something like "Legato" and it automatically changes to that patch. Almost behaves like a notation software responding to dynamics etc via what's written in the score. Instead of having to put in key switches etc. Now all they have to do is open their project, load their Vienna Preset and Cubase will map all the expression/articulation symbols and text directly to the proper sample in VSL's interface. We have been talking about this over at the VSL website for a little while and the users of Cubase love it. Does that make sense? I don't use EXS at the moment but I would think that this rule would apply across the board? Cubase allows the ability to put in expressions and articulations into the project/score and then those send commands to the sampler to change to the correct loaded articulations within the VSL interface. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |